Re:Ford Mustang Mach-E Using BlueCruise at Time of Crash: NTSB
by usrusr on Saturday April 13, 2024 @07:29PM
(#40027159)
Stuff like checking the rear view mirror when slamming the brakes upon some surprise uncertainty, true. Humans will always be bad at this, but for a computer it's trivial to include the tail situation in the brake decision.
Re:Ford Mustang Mach-E Using BlueCruise at Time of Crash: NTSB
by al_borland on Saturday April 13, 2024 @07:56PM
(#40027362)
I think the issue is that basic ACC doesn’t understand intent and the larger picture. If someone merges in and I have control, I can usually just let off the gas a little bit, as they will likely speed up, or move out of the lane shortly. Actual braking is almost never required. But the ACC just sees some slow moving object inches from the front of the car and flips out to try and get back to a good state.
Re:Ford Mustang Mach-E Using BlueCruise at Time of Crash: NTSB
by FabHK on Sunday April 14, 2024 @01:29AM
(#40028884)
AKA Moravec's paradox.
> Moravec wrote in 1988, "it is comparatively easy to make computers exhibit adult level performance on intelligence tests or playing checkers, and difficult or impossible to give them the skills of a one-year-old when it comes to perception and mobility".
> Steven Pinker wrote in 1994 that "the main lesson of thirty-five years of AI research is that the hard problems are easy and the easy problems are hard."
Re:Ford Mustang Mach-E Using BlueCruise at Time of Crash: NTSB
by seanmcdirmid on Sunday April 14, 2024 @01:35AM
(#40028909)
https://xkcd.com/1425/
Although that has obviously changed in recent years.
There are things that humans can learn and do extremely quickly, or figure out on the fly, that robots require extensive training for.