Re:Florence Museum Won Suit Against Publisher That Used Mich...
by not_your_mentat on Saturday April 13, 2024 @01:29PM
(#40024590)
This is strange conflicted space for me. Were this the case, Disney would have had to produce nothing but original work, which would probably benefit us today but would leave us without the eventual cultural heritage that they produced (if it can ever be pulled from their claws). I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that public domain is very much like other idealogical freedoms I was raised to believe in, which is to say beautiful conceptually but possibly messy and requiring potentially painful sacrifices on the part of individuals if consistency with the ideal is the goal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Florence Museum Won Suit Against Publisher That Used Mich...
by troupo on Saturday April 13, 2024 @05:22PM
(#40026277)
Thing is, Disney has profited immensely from public domain, and then they have done everything in their power to restrict public domain as much as possible.
Works have to be released into the public domain, or there will be nothing but licensed regurgitation of the same things.
Re:Florence Museum Won Suit Against Publisher That Used Mich...
by olliej on Saturday April 13, 2024 @06:33PM
(#40026790)
Exactly: a huge proportion of Disney’s historical works are for existing stories which had far less IP protection than Disney’s reproductions had.