Re:Google threatens to cut off news after California propose...
by g8oz on Friday April 12, 2024 @10:53PM
(#40020078)
Do you call that NPR story proof of a bias worse than what happens at other institutions? Or because it's biased in the direction that doesn't align with your views?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google threatens to cut off news after California propose...
by kQq9oHeAz6wLLS on Friday April 12, 2024 @11:01PM
(#40020113)
I think the biggest complaint about NPR having a bias - any bias - is that it's publicly funded.
Re:Google threatens to cut off news after California propose...
by DerekL on Saturday April 13, 2024 @12:12AM
(#40020430)
Mostly, NPR isn't publicly funded. It gets about 1% of its funding from the federal government. Public radio stations that carry NPR shows get more, but it's only about 17% from federal, state, and local governments. Some of them are also funded by universities, some of which are public.
Re:Google threatens to cut off news after California propose...
by asow92 on Saturday April 13, 2024 @10:49AM
(#40023502)
If donating to NPR is a tax write off, it is publicly funded. If the majority of those donors are politically biased, they will create a feedback loop where news is catered to those donating to them. This isn't wrong per se, but just what it is.
Re:Google threatens to cut off news after California propose...
by asow92 on Saturday April 13, 2024 @07:40AM
(#40022420)
If NPR only represents a fraction of our nation’s viewpoints, they are not living up to their namesake of national public radio. If they wanted to call themselves progressive public radio I’d take no issue.