Re:Stack Overflow is documentation, not Q&A, and that's bad
by mtlguitarist on Thursday April 11, 2024 @07:05PM
(#40007758)
Okay but is this a failure of the user or an unintuitive UX? We can't just expect to pass cognitive burden onto users in a million places. UI affordances and conventions exist for a reason.
Re:Stack Overflow is documentation, not Q&A, and that's bad
by renewiltord on Thursday April 11, 2024 @07:19PM
(#40007850)
I imagine that's what causes the confusion. The big green check is a Q&A site model ("this worked for me") but the site is intended as a documentation site ("this is how you do it"). It's a bit strange to have one question closed as a duplicate of another one that has an answer that only worked for the other question asker.
>Accepting an answer is not meant to be a definitive and final statement indicating that the question has now been answered perfectly. It simply means that the author received an answer that worked for them personally.
https://stackoverflow.com/help/accepted-answer