I was directly responding to the implicit question about 'sustainable regeneration of farmland', where you added '(whatever that means) '.

I explained one common sustainable regeneration method, and I touch why it meets the required elements of regeneration and sustainability.

You arbitrarily reclassify this as a "disposal method"; without including any counter-reasoning.

You berate me for not reading and not providing an alternative to mere disposal.

As a reminder: "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith." --https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html