A better option would be to decentralize the monitoring and enforcement. Autonomous robots with cameras and guns could be installed everywhere - - they'd process all video locally, by themselves, and could take action right away. This way privacy is not violated.
Soon on 0days market price list:
- Root access at google.com: $200.000
- Data access to any Ring video doorbell cameras: $150.000
- Full control of gun equipped robots at schools: $50.000
Prices pulled out of you know where, but you get the point.
Yikes! That’s gonna violate something alright.
At this point I'm not even sure if you're sarcastic. Or are you an agent of the upcoming robot uprising? Who knows!
[1] I say could because it probably involves the mental state of the person commiting the crime.
No offense but when were you born? Surveillance technology is relatively modern. What do you think the world look liked 50 years ago? 100?
Surveillance doesn’t guarantee safety. But what is the counter proposal on how to turn a large, unsafe location into a safe one?
I expect downvotes for this. But seriously. What do you propose? Is surveillance not exactly how countries like the UK and Singapore provide safety? Can anyone cite an example of a “safety turnaround” not based on surveillance?
Believe you me I wish that weren’t the case! Someone show me the alternative, please!