Re:Randomization in such studies is arguably a negative in p...
by lupire on Friday April 05, 2024 @04:55PM
(#39947097)
He's complaining about the statistics version of a con artist putting on a nice suit, or making a glossy website for your crap company. Or putting out a "white paper".
Adding the easy trappings or dishonest indicators of "professionalism" to your junk product is bad for society.
It's not a novel insight, and the discussion is rather cluttered with irrelevant detail, so I not sure it's worth sharing. (Of course it's fine for Gelman to write his meandering thoughts on his blog.)
Adding the easy trappings or dishonest indicators of "professionalism" to your junk product is bad for society.
It's not a novel insight, and the discussion is rather cluttered with irrelevant detail, so I not sure it's worth sharing. (Of course it's fine for Gelman to write his meandering thoughts on his blog.)