News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reflections on Distrusting xz by dullcrisp on Wednesday April 03, 2024 @11:03AM (#39918419)
The exploit could be detected with a fuzzer perhaps. The infiltration seems like it was something that would be very easy for a funded intelligence agency to do, and would be nigh undetectable if they had been subtly introducing bugs rather than shipping a sophisticated backdoor to every Linux distro.

You have to assume if this was an intelligence agency they didn’t burn their only agent like this.

Re:Reflections on Distrusting xz by HankB99 on Wednesday April 03, 2024 @02:20PM (#39921031)
> they didn’t burn their only agent like this.

I think I'd characterize that as "their only identity." What's the chance that some number (>1) of actual agents were sharing this identity? If that's the case, I'd extrapolate that to multiple identities. In fact the social engineering to gain the trust of the original maintainer likely involved several identities.

I suspect that detectability of intentionally injected bugs would be very low.