Xz: Can you spot the single character that disabled Linux landlock?

Re:Xz: Can you spot the single character that disabled Linux... by mewpmewp2 on Saturday March 30, 2024 @10:01PM (#39880656)

I think main issue was that it was embedded in the file itself like that. Would have preferred to have it in a separate valid C file with syntax highlighting etc and being parsed from that file.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Xz: Can you spot the single character that disabled Linux... by tsimionescu on Sunday March 31, 2024 @03:23AM (#39882173)

Perhaps, but given how most build systems work, that would complicate things in other ways (since build systems often try to compile all .c files).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Xz: Can you spot the single character that disabled Linux... by throwaway2037 on Sunday March 31, 2024 @05:59AM (#39882878)

I am a CMake novice. Is that true for CMake in this example?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Xz: Can you spot the single character that disabled Linux... by jcelerier on Sunday March 31, 2024 @07:27AM (#39883258)

Definitely not, cmake's try_compile function even directly supports being passed a source file.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Xz: Can you spot the single character that disabled Linux... by mewpmewp2 on Sunday March 31, 2024 @08:41AM (#39883740)

Put it in a special folder that is ignored from the build.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Xz: Can you spot the single character that disabled Linux... by account42 on Monday April 08, 2024 @09:33AM (#39969562)

That's really not how most build systems work.

[ Parent | on HN ]