How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code hosting platform

Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by pimlottc on Saturday March 30, 2024 @11:59AM (#39876076)

I think this is a good point, and also part of the larger trend of Internet activity moving to centralized providers. Users are now habituated to look for an existing platform to host their content, whether that's video (YouTube/Tiktok), blog posts (Medium/Substack), hot takes (X/Threads) or code (Github). It doesn't even occur to most people that there's another way to do it. They see these companies as just part of the public infrastructure of the Internet.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by vineyardmike on Saturday March 30, 2024 @01:44PM (#39876936)

Because it’s so damn easy. I started contributing to OSS and creating repos on GitHub when I was 16. I was not able (or interested in) managing my own git server; I didn’t have any connections to Apache.org. Sure I could’ve emailed diffs to some mailing list, as I know many people have done for years, but GH is a vastly better experience.

Github was so accessible that it made possible what otherwise would not have been.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by paulddraper on Saturday March 30, 2024 @09:39PM (#39880537)

Because the other ways

1. Are logistically harder.

2. Don't have an existing community.

If you want to create an OSS project with greatest adoption, you're best bet is GitHub.

[ Parent | on HN ]