News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by asabla on Saturday March 30, 2024 @10:26AM (#39875203)
This is how I remembered it as well.

Kind of preferred Google Code over GitHub for a while. Or at least until it had enough functionality and/or tools to support it.

Almost feels like it's time again for a shift...but it will probably be a while

Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by robertlagrant on Saturday March 30, 2024 @12:30PM (#39876309)
It would be good if they gitlab and gitea standardised some features such as how to track issues in a repo, to make a baseline of portability available. Then they can say migrate to one of us from GitHub using this special tool, and then you'll have a nice portable repo from then on.

That might help a little with the transition, ready for when MS does one of their crazy moves and people suddenly want to switch.

Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by 3seashells on Saturday March 30, 2024 @10:29AM (#39875235)
We are in that phase we're non ms incompatible features will be added to mgit and the flesh eating plant slowly closes shut.
Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by a_random_canuck on Saturday March 30, 2024 @10:42AM (#39875350)
Honestly it’s been time for a shift ever since they were bought by Microsoft…
Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by ladzoppelin on Saturday March 30, 2024 @11:39PM (#39881187)
Yeah doesn't something this important need lots of money and accountability behind it so if sh@t hits the fan, its their burden and not an underfunded team. Like look at the XZ thing, things can get really serious really quick. I am not saying its a perfect situation but Github actions and the enterprise features are actually really good and I don't understand how any team smaller than the big 3 could handle the amount of data/users/traffic/importance that Github has become. Just an opinion ..