News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Publishers secure widespread support in copyright battle ... by AnthonyMouse on Monday March 25, 2024 @11:59PM (#39824161)
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UMG_Recordings,_Inc._v._MP3.co....

This is a district court case (i.e. one that doesn't set precedent) where the record companies liked the result, which also effectively bankrupted the defendant. One of the media companies then bought the defendant, causing the case to not be appealed.

It's not obvious they would have lost on appeal. The district court largely ignored the Sony Betamax case and what MP3.com was doing was effectively operating tape recorder with a longer wire on it.

Re:Publishers secure widespread support in copyright battle ... by dano on Tuesday March 26, 2024 @11:30AM (#39829146)
MP3.com made mechanical copies without permission. Pretty black & white. Vivendi Universal acquired the company for $372 million in 2002 mostly because they were interested in moving forward with digital distribution. The MP3.com engineering team then went on to build PressPlay with Sony and Universal, which was later sold to Roxio and renamed Napster. I'd be happy to answer any questions about MP3.com.
Re:Publishers secure widespread support in copyright battle ... by AnthonyMouse on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @02:53PM (#39843147)
> MP3.com made mechanical copies without permission. Pretty black & white.

So does a Betamax device though?