Re:WSJ made to believe Google abandons strict net neutrality
by jmtame on Monday December 15, 2008 @02:52AM
(#398160)
I think that was the first time I saw you write the word "pwned."
Hopefully the WSJ fixes this article (they considers edge caching as a violation to network neutrality, clearly it isn't because it doesn't slow any other sites down).
Hopefully the WSJ fixes this article (they considers edge caching as a violation to network neutrality, clearly it isn't because it doesn't slow any other sites down).