News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'Super memory': Why Emily Nash is sharing her brain with ... by datameta on Sunday March 24, 2024 @02:28PM (#39809125)
I think where their attention is and therefore what gets encoded is similar to the rest of us. In one instance they were unable to recall what the interviewers were wearing after spending two hours with them. They remember their experiences visually, essentially. So if information was not actually recorded, it can't be searched for.

On a different note, I'm curious how long people with photographic memory store the info at the same fidelity. Does their perfect recollection of a landscape they looked at for a few minutes fade somewhat after a year or so?

Re:'Super memory': Why Emily Nash is sharing her brain with ... by thecoppinger on Sunday March 24, 2024 @02:38PM (#39809201)
I read somewhere years ago that each subsequent recall of a memory is remembering the last time you recalled it—in a sense, an entropy-like phenomenon called memory reconsolidation.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/memory-rec...

Re:'Super memory': Why Emily Nash is sharing her brain with ... by philipswood on Monday March 25, 2024 @12:09AM (#39812795)
Is there any solid evidence that photographic memory exists?
Re:'Super memory': Why Emily Nash is sharing her brain with ... by datameta on Monday March 25, 2024 @02:40PM (#39819829)