News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Steve Ballmer's Microsoft by zacharycohn on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @07:40PM (#3979547)
They executed well on the XBox and didn't need to reboot.

They misstepped with WinMo. Then they rebooted. Start your count over again.

Re:Steve Ballmer's Microsoft by latch on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @07:53PM (#3979588)
No, they didn't. Over the course of its life, the XBox brand is still billions in the red. It only started turning up a relatively small profit a year or two ago. It has a long way to go before anyone should consider it successful.

The problem with consoles is that there's no brand loyalty (except for Nintendo). It only takes 1 bad console for an established player to vanish, and 1 good console for a newcomer to succeed.

Xbox live might be changing that, but it's still waayyy too early to call it either a success or failure. Though, certainly financially, it's been a small disaster so far.

Re:Steve Ballmer's Microsoft by Smudge on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @08:09PM (#3979640)
Welcome to consumer electronics. Comparatively speaking, Microsoft has fared quite well.
Re:Steve Ballmer's Microsoft by seanmcdirmid on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @08:41PM (#3979747)
Comparatively speaking, Apple has done much better in consumer electronics.
Re:Steve Ballmer's Microsoft by lmm on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @07:01AM (#3981482)
Sure. Apple has done spectacularly well. It's a big jump from "not as good as Apple" to "worst CEO in America".
Re:Steve Ballmer's Microsoft by seanmcdirmid on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @07:27AM (#3981537)
I won't make any judgement on leadership, and want to just point out this fact. A peer of Microsoft is succeeding very well in consumer electronics, meaning Microsoft could potentially as well and would become insanely successful (big profits beyond enterprise). Disclaimer: I work for Microsoft and so would love for them to realize that potential. I'm sure it is much more complicated than "replace CEO" to get there.