Re:If you're seeing ads on Wikipedia, your computer probably...
by kokey on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @05:10PM
(#3978873)
The worst are the adds with a picture of some guy called Jimmy and another one with long hair. Both asking for money. It takes up the whole top of the page.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:If you're seeing ads on Wikipedia, your computer probably...
by epidemian on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @07:32PM
(#3979524)
I can't believe this comment is being upvoted. Do you somehow feel it's wrong that Wikipedia asks for donations?
Re:If you're seeing ads on Wikipedia, your computer probably...
by kokey on Thursday May 17, 2012 @08:45AM
(#3986690)
I also can't believe it was upvoted, mainly because it was a silly bit of sarcasm.
Re:If you're seeing ads on Wikipedia, your computer probably...
by sien on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @07:13PM
(#3979457)
Would you prefer it if wikipedia just ran a line of ads all the time?
This is a serious question. It's open to others to.
Re:If you're seeing ads on Wikipedia, your computer probably...
by twelvechairs on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @07:38PM
(#3979540)
I think the real answer is it doesn't really matter. Especially for those of us with adblock.
Re:If you're seeing ads on Wikipedia, your computer probably...
by altrego99 on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @06:39AM
(#3981422)
I agree and hence if it means more profit for Wikimedia organization, from people who do not use or do not know about adblock, then it is definitely a better choice than the current donation model.
Re:If you're seeing ads on Wikipedia, your computer probably...
by alexchamberlain on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @02:43AM
(#3980796)
As long as they were clearly marked as Ads and small text-based ads, then yes.
I'd like to see sponsored pages.
Re:If you're seeing ads on Wikipedia, your computer probably...
by Flimm on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @06:41PM
(#3979311)
I wish more ads were like Wikipedia's: relevant, temporary and of great consequence. I don't see how they qualify for being "the worst".
Re:If you're seeing ads on Wikipedia, your computer probably...
by notatoad on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @12:32AM
(#3980484)
they're the worst because they're the best. normal ads i can ignore. wikipedia's ads are not only visually hard to ignore, they're morally hard to ignore (and they don't go away after you donate)