News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Array Languages: R vs. APL by bruturis on Thursday March 21, 2024 @05:45PM (#39784783)
Analogous code in J,

  /:~ s -. p [ p =: s*/s [ s=: 2+i.48
An exercise for numpy, test that GCD(x,y) * LCM(x,y) = x*y using 1000 random numbers in the range 0..99 for x e y.

  test =:  (* = *. * +.) & ?
  *./ test~  1000 # 100
Re:Array Languages: R vs. APL by cl3misch on Friday March 22, 2024 @06:44AM (#39789305)
Thanks, that was fun.

    def d(x): N = arange(1, x + 1); return N[x % N == 0]
    def m(x, n): return x * arange(1, n + 1)
    def gcd(x, y): return max(set(d(x)) & set(d(y)))
    def lcm(x, y): return min(set(m(x, y)) & set(m(y, x)))
    def test(x, y): return gcd(x, y) * lcm(x, y) == x * y
    all([test(x, y) for (x, y) in randint(1, 100, (1000, 2))])  # True
I am not a good golfer. Now I want to look at the codegolf stackexchange for this...
Re:Array Languages: R vs. APL by bear8642 on Friday March 22, 2024 @08:56PM (#39796388)
Equivalently in APL:

  ⎕io←0               ⍝ to match J
  test ← (× = ∨ × ∧) ∘ ?
  ∧⌿ test⍨ 1000⍴100