News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on If gravity isn't a force, then why does it "need" a boson?. Parent comment

Re:If gravity isn't a force, then why does it "need" a boson? by CamperBob2 on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @12:02PM (#39768430)
Honestly, the flagged/dead answer from ChatGPT makes a lot of sense to me. Can someone explain where it goes wrong, without resorting to the usual snide remarks about parrots and other whistling-past-the-graveyard rhetoric?

Is it just making up BS regarding the attributes imparted by various spin values, or is that a reasonable explanation of why gravitons are presumed to be spin-2 particles?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:If gravity isn't a force, then why does it "need" a boson? by brylie on Thursday March 21, 2024 @10:03AM (#39778632)
Indeed. I shared what I thought was a detailed and helpful generative response to further the discussion and hopefully receive feedback from those knowledgeable on the topic. It's disappointing to see it met with downvotes and flagging, rather than constructive conversation.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:If gravity isn't a force, then why does it "need" a boson? by CamperBob2 on Thursday March 21, 2024 @11:10AM (#39779488)
Same old story throughout history. People feel threatened by technology, and they lash out.

It's disappointing here, for sure.

[ Parent | on HN ]