Re:Thoughts on the Future of Software Development
by JackMorgan on Tuesday March 19, 2024 @10:36AM
(#39756146)
As a counterpoint, the main nemesis of the book comes from software that is found in archaeological expedition. While software archeology doesn't show up after the first chapter, the ramifications of what happens in that world due to so much software is pretty central.
Re:Thoughts on the Future of Software Development
by scubbo on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @12:43PM
(#39769037)
This is certainly true, and doesn't detract from my disappointment not to have actually seen the software archeology in practice.
Re:Thoughts on the Future of Software Development
by Taylor_OD on Tuesday March 19, 2024 @11:19AM
(#39756665)
I'd argue that while its not a core diving part narrative... It is central to the idea of the book and its sequel. It's a decent sized book with a lot of ideas and the idea of code archeology and the repercussions of it are what the book is about as much as any of the other main ideas.
But yes, if you want a book that focused only on that... This is going to disapoint.
Re:Thoughts on the Future of Software Development
by Taylor_OD on Tuesday March 19, 2024 @11:20AM
(#39756668)
I'd argue that while its not a core diving part narrative... It is central to the idea of the book and its sequel. It's a decent sized book with a lot of ideas and the idea of code archeology and the repercussions of it are what the book is about as much as any of the other main ideas.
But yes, if you want a book that focused only on that... This is going to disappoint.
Re:Thoughts on the Future of Software Development
by scubbo on Thursday March 21, 2024 @10:55PM
(#39787021)
> It is central to the idea of the book and its sequel. [..] the idea of code archeology and the repercussions of it are what the book is about as much as any of the other main ideas.
Can't speak to the sequel as I gave up on the series after that, but it's _really_ not relevant to the plot or ideas of the first book at all. All that matters for the plot is that a hostile, powerful, uncontrollable AI arises. In the book, it _happens_ to be because of a code archeologist "delving too greedily and too deep"; but the plot would not be changed one iota if it had simply arisen (and gone off the rails) as a product of general AI development.
Don't get me wrong, it's still a decent book on its own merits - but don't go into it expecting that to be the main point of the book (I did, and disappointed as a result).