News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Dear Paul Graham, there is no cookie banner law. Parent comment

Re:Dear Paul Graham, there is no cookie banner law by rvense on Monday March 18, 2024 @09:05AM (#39743877)
It is the companies that suck, and Paul Graham is (quite literally) invested in the suckage, wherefore this dumb tweet. Which, if one wanted to create an ad campaign for that eternal Upton Sinclair quote, couldn't have been done much better.

(Thanks for the site though, Paul)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dear Paul Graham, there is no cookie banner law by kortilla on Monday March 18, 2024 @09:07AM (#39743900)
Paul is very unlikely to be invested in tracking unless he has some shares in Google/Facebook. Startups in tracking aren’t really a thing
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dear Paul Graham, there is no cookie banner law by toyg on Monday March 18, 2024 @11:18AM (#39745735)
I expect most startups "integrate" their regular revenues (if they have any) with some sort of adtech deal.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dear Paul Graham, there is no cookie banner law by nickpp on Monday March 18, 2024 @02:30PM (#39748092)
Any source for those allegations or is it only your imagination?
[ Parent | on HN ]