News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by Zambyte on Friday March 15, 2024 @08:55PM (#39722299)
I didn't say it was "the" solution, but it absolutely is a solution to what they asked.
Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by karlshea on Friday March 15, 2024 @10:19PM (#39722757)
It’s “a” solution but not a “helpful” or “realistic” solution.
Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by belladoreai on Saturday March 16, 2024 @08:30AM (#39725341)
Not sure why you're being downvoted, because your comment succinctly highlights the issues and is correct.
Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by Zambyte on Saturday March 16, 2024 @09:50AM (#39725911)
It doesn't highlight any issues. It effectively just says "you are wrong". It doesn't really add anything to the discussion.

> Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by belladoreai on Saturday March 16, 2024 @10:49AM (#39726434)
It highlights the issue that the suggested solution is a theoretic or academic solution which we theorize might work out some day, but is not currently a realistic solution for the need to provide food for artists to eat so that they could remain alive.

The fact that you disagree with the explanation due to ideological purity reasons is not grounds for downvoting it.

Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by Zambyte on Saturday March 16, 2024 @11:39AM (#39726848)
> the suggested solution is a theoretic or academic solution which we theorize might work out some day, but is not currently a realistic solution for the need to provide food for artists to eat so that they could remain alive.

These are all your words, not theirs. They didn't suggest this at all.

> The fact that you disagree with the explanation due to ideological purity reasons is not grounds for downvoting it.

This is true, but:

1) I didn't downvote it (I literally can't)

2) There are other good reasons to downvote it, such as what I linked.

Unless you have something more to say about cyrpto I think we should leave this here.

Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by karlshea on Saturday March 16, 2024 @02:07PM (#39728078)
> These are all your words, not theirs. They didn't suggest this at all.

I'm failing to understand how you could have read what I wrote and come to the conclusion I didn't suggest that, given that I literally said it was not realistic.

Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by karlshea on Saturday March 16, 2024 @02:11PM (#39728113)
Well, that's your opinion. I believe I highlighted the main issues with your suggestion, and added exactly the same helpfulness to the discussion as an assertion that artists should rely on patrons to send them cryptocurrency to support themselves.
Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by colesantiago on Friday March 15, 2024 @09:03PM (#39722351)
It still isn't a solution any way you cut it and in any case, hence the keyword 'absolutely'
Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by Zambyte on Friday March 15, 2024 @09:16PM (#39722440)
It's a payment system that allows adult content.
Re:Gumroad no longer allows most NSFW art, leaving its adult... by belladoreai on Saturday March 16, 2024 @08:31AM (#39725346)
If you're an artist who needs to eat food in order to live, this "payment system" does not facilitate your ability to achieve that.