Nothing negative about it. They're objectively bad. If I was insulting artistic talents, if he had done them himself, then I could see hurt feelings. These were done by algorithm. The author didn't create them. He wrote code that did so. As I already said, if he continues, some insight might shake out.

You're all poorer for seeing negativity where none exists. You don't even realize you're doing it, do you?

> Wouldn't be shocked if he eventually shakes a few insights down from the clever tree.

Come on, there's no way to read that other than condescending. You clearly don't think much of the author. And, as you've been told, she's a "she".

I would think that says more about reading ability, than anything else.