Re:Mass Timber Is Great, but It Will Not Solve the Housing S...
by mhuffman on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @05:07PM
(#39697524)
Also the building restrictions in a highly-populated area. I remember a person on here breaking down the costs of building multi-family housing. Basically in SF or LA you can only build high-priced multi-family housing to make any profit, otherwise it would be at a high loss and that is assuming something like rent controls, because otherwise the price would be driven up anyway.
Re:Mass Timber Is Great, but It Will Not Solve the Housing S...
by bombcar on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @05:50PM
(#39697997)
Often the easiest thing to do is increase luxury supply (because by definition the rich have the money to buy).
And unless you have literally infinite incoming new residents or people who want to squat on unrented property, increasing the top-end supply will also increase other ranges. It might still not allow someone on minimum wage to live there, but the total number of units increases - unless you replace cheaper units with more expensive same or less density units.
It's triply confounded by the huge group of people who simply don't understand the math behind renting (and this includes many landlords, sadly).