EU Passes AI Act: First regulation on Artificial Intelligence

Re:EU Passes AI Act: First regulation on Artificial Intellig... by Jensson on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @09:00AM (#39690835)

I think these parts are relevant, it will be very nice to get this for LLM and image generators:

> Generative AI, like ChatGPT, will not be classified as high-risk, but will have to comply with transparency requirements and EU copyright law:

> Disclosing that the content was generated by AI

> Designing the model to prevent it from generating illegal content

> Publishing summaries of copyrighted data used for training

This means that now if an article was generated by LLM they are legally required to disclose that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU Passes AI Act: First regulation on Artificial Intellig... by TunaTuna on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @09:06AM (#39690891)

Those last two are just going to make llms harder to use and act dumber. Annoying but not the end of the world. I have no idea how disclosure can possibly be enforced though. There's just no realistic way to distinguish a reasonably good image generation and a photoshop job.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU Passes AI Act: First regulation on Artificial Intellig... by Bjorkbat on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @01:18PM (#39694361)

> Disclosing that the content was generated by AI

Hmm, hadn't thought of that angle before. So, like, if one uses a copilot to generate code, does it now have to be watermarked somehow?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU Passes AI Act: First regulation on Artificial Intellig... by dr_dshiv on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @03:04PM (#39695910)

Critiques:

1. "AI generated content": Is it generated by LLMs if LLMs were used in any way? e.g., getting ideas? If you use a single word? Sentence? Paragraph? If a person has edited things down?

2. "Prevent it from generating illegal content": It is illegal to libel. An autocorrect can generate libel.

3. "summaries of copyrighted data": and if it used GPT4 as the evaluator?

[ Parent | on HN ]