News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: dockerc – Docker image to static executable "com... by diego_sandoval on Wednesday March 06, 2024 @11:36PM (#39625096)
If they don't want people to find their social media profiles, then they shouldn't have social media profiles.
Re:Show HN: dockerc – Docker image to static executable "com... by navigate8310 on Thursday March 07, 2024 @03:01AM (#39626395)
Unfortunately to access Lynda, you have to make a LinkedIn account
Re:Show HN: dockerc – Docker image to static executable "com... by bagels on Thursday March 07, 2024 @04:14AM (#39626884)
Who is Lynda?
Re:Show HN: dockerc – Docker image to static executable "com... by yard2010 on Thursday March 07, 2024 @06:24AM (#39627688)
She is a really good teacher of Actionscript 3.0. at least last time I checked.
Re:Show HN: dockerc – Docker image to static executable "com... by ametrau on Thursday March 07, 2024 @07:20AM (#39628162)
Nostalgic
Re:Show HN: dockerc – Docker image to static executable "com... by citizenpaul on Thursday March 07, 2024 @11:20AM (#39630888)
I know, she was asking for it right?

Nice victim blame.

Re:Show HN: dockerc – Docker image to static executable "com... by diego_sandoval on Thursday March 07, 2024 @03:44PM (#39634374)
"Victim", as understood by most people, implies that someone did something wrong to them. There's nothing wrong with seeing someone's profile online, so your analogy doesn't apply.

Thought exercise: Am I being a "victim" of you, because you posted a comment disagreeing with me?

Re:Show HN: dockerc – Docker image to static executable "com... by citizenpaul on Monday March 11, 2024 @01:11PM (#39670809)
There is no crime here is true. I really hope that's exactly what you mean.

However this person that is unstable or at least very aggressive and is clearly trying to track someone. I really hope you don't mean that because someone is publicly available that it is ok to do what you want to them.

IE "asking for it" because a person was around to commit a crime against so its their fault for not staying behind locked doors with a shotgun their whole life.

You are very close to simply stating that having an online profile makes it ok to do things to someone because you have dictated they should not have one if they don't want to be a victim of a crime in the future. You are also sort of imposing your view on everyone in the world that social media is not a necessary part of life nowadays. (that is a different debate)