News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EU aims to shift European arms industry to 'war economy m... by The_Colonel on Tuesday March 05, 2024 @05:33PM (#39610010)
Let me present you an alternative. Europe can build up a credible defense capability which will provide a strong deterrence to Russia. In that case you don't have to die in the trenches and you don't have to spend your life running away from the aggressor.

Nazi Germany did not invade Switzerland, USSR did not invade Finland (after suffering horrible losses in the Winter war), even though both had their own claims on them, because the costs of such an adventure were considered too high. A big part of this deterrence was a population willing to fight to defend their homeland.

Re:EU aims to shift European arms industry to 'war economy m... by type0 on Tuesday March 05, 2024 @09:05PM (#39611427)
Re:EU aims to shift European arms industry to 'war economy m... by tim333 on Wednesday March 06, 2024 @06:46PM (#39623315)
Also of course the USSR did invade Finland but got stopped before they could take that much territory, maybe a bit like what will happen in Ukraine.
Re:EU aims to shift European arms industry to 'war economy m... by type0 on Thursday March 07, 2024 @08:58AM (#39629118)
Not at all like in Ukraine, winter war ended because ww2 started, though you could also see it as the beginning of the same war
Re:EU aims to shift European arms industry to 'war economy m... by Wytwwww on Wednesday March 06, 2024 @03:34PM (#39621051)
> Nazi Germany did not invade Switzerland, USSR did not invade Finland

To be fair these aren't exactly the most relevant examples. On paper the balance of power economically (and military to a somewhat lesser degree) is certainly on the side of the EU/NATO. It would be relative pretty cheap to invest enough just to deter a second rate country (besides nukes) like Russia.