Re:AWS acquires Talen's 960MW nuclear data center campus in ...
by Waterluvian on Monday March 04, 2024 @09:13PM
(#39598679)
An API to say “only use the cheaper off peak compute” could make a lot of sense for numerous use cases.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AWS acquires Talen's 960MW nuclear data center campus in ...
by jethro_tell on Monday March 04, 2024 @09:23PM
(#39598732)
So, spot instances?
Re:AWS acquires Talen's 960MW nuclear data center campus in ...
by Waterluvian on Monday March 04, 2024 @09:32PM
(#39598792)
I looked it up and it seems like that’s what they’re selling yeah! Though aws advertising really doesn’t want to say how they’re so cheap on their front page!
Re:AWS acquires Talen's 960MW nuclear data center campus in ...
by tnmom on Monday March 04, 2024 @10:06PM
(#39599023)
Their marginal cost for you using otherwise-unutilized capacity is near zero; probably just power really. So if it’s a choice between getting $0 and $0.1 for a $1/hr instance, that’s an easy choice.
You just have to be sure to make the spot stuff juuust unreliable enough that people can’t run their full workloads on it all the time.
Re:AWS acquires Talen's 960MW nuclear data center campus in ...
by skeeter2020 on Monday March 04, 2024 @11:19PM
(#39599402)
if you've got the engineering in place for distributed fault tolerance you can run a lot of your workload on pre-emptable spot instances. There's an entire "as a service" product space that does this, abstracting away the challenging parts and arbitraging the difference