_zoltan_
_zoltan_ on Hacker News
I appreciate the time you took to reply to me.
Thank you!
so the workers understand cross worker topology? Do they always just see individual tiles? what if there is a dependency - eg I'm streaming data and want to compute something later on an earlier computation? How would that get distributed?
sounds very cool - is this basically "C" support for cuTile? :)
In 2 years once it fails and Intel shuts it down completely you mean :)
That's not entirely true: my work might get zero traction because nobody will know about it.
hmm, I'm sure with a model that is not restricted, one might be able to extract these locally.
Cold, no sun AND no alcohol? Man that must suck. :)
As Terry Tao said, LLMs are not outsmarting us, they are out remembering us.
I'm fairly sure your understanding is not fully accurate.
But reading the doc if it's maintained llmwiki style is much cheaper than reading the code on a large codebase.
reaching the goal is what matters. I never understood people who don't get satisfaction from getting there. I don't care that AI writes the code.
why does it matter that it's a vibe coded website?
I actually look at the tests first. But for this to work, you have to have good hygiene. If the test makes sense, fails without the PR but passed with the PR, I'm almost happy.
billions? who is running BILLIONS of agents?
tens, hundreds, maybe a couple thousand at a time? absolutely.
I optimize a lot of CUDA and it got really, really good at it.
you might be OK with calling everybody using LLMs a bunch of noobs. I disagree. this has nothing to do with my own usage.
Anti LLM is not justified, it's crazy. They are digging their own grave.
I don't need to go that far, living in Switzerland. I don't know why you'd assume I'm in the US, or somehow that I regard Kraft as great cheese.
for your point a: writing code by hand puts you ahead of the people who don't write code by hand, eg, the people using LLMs to generate code? that doesn't make much sense assuming both of those personas are senior SWEs.
Yes, it is a waste of time right now not to use AI to write code.
It's the same category of "artisan code" like "artisan cheese": you can do it if you have a ton of free time as a hobby but other than a hobby? Not worth it.
Eh, take your fav painter then.
that's a dumb comparison. are you equating writing code to painting like Michaelangelo?
coding for the sake of coding is, well, dumb.
> Focusing on data structures, architecture and algorithms is what competency in programming has looked like since forever
yes, being able to bang out leetcode hard from head on an interview on paper matters so much... oh wait. it does not.
in the real world, outside of interview questions, it hardly matters. when it comes there, I'll optimizite it, but getting the first system up and running in a way I want is way more fun & challenging. need a lock free ringbuffer? I'll look up what's the latest way to build it. or just ask my AI.
a lot of people don't understand that the joy of making something is
not coding but actually being able to build anything I want. AI just made it 50x better, as exactly as you said, we don't need to deal with the useless junk (what's the API syntax? what's the library syntax? oh it changed in the last 3 versions, let me look up the new API, this and that...).
it's great.
Welcome to the new world. I, for one, welcome our new math overlords. :)
> The benchmark was very simple. A single-shard point select, one row fetched per-query by primary key. No writes, joins, or cross-shard queries. The workload that each shard receives is isolated, in that there are no single queries that span multiple shards.
I mean... What's the point of this "benchmark"?
hahah :) sorry, typo... in hungarian both v and w are the same sound spoken so if I don't concentrate, easy to mix up.