Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-...
by mrinterweb on Friday March 01, 2024 @01:01PM
(#39564620)
I've been really hung up on the irony of "Open" part of the OpenAI name. I figure "Open" must mean "open for business". What is open about OpenAI?
Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-...
by dkjaudyeqooe on Friday March 01, 2024 @01:13PM
(#39564780)
The most oppressive regimes have "Democratic" or "People's" in the official name of their country.
Someone took inspiration from this.
Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-...
by wmf on Friday March 01, 2024 @01:41PM
(#39565157)
They changed their minds and didn't change the name. That's all.
Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-...
by mrinterweb on Friday March 01, 2024 @02:28PM
(#39565774)
If that's the case the name should come with an asterisk and footnote. Keeping "Open" in the name is not genuine. Its would be like a superhero group called themselves "Hero Squad" and decided being superheros is not profitable as villainy, but still calling themselves Hero Squad despite the obvious operational changes.
Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-...
by TheKarateKid on Friday March 01, 2024 @01:37PM
(#39565121)
While I completely agree, I think we've seen enough to realize that something as powerful as what OpenAI is developing shouldn't be freely released to the public. Not as a product, nor as source code.
Dangerous and powerful things like weapons and chemicals are restricted in both physical and informational form for safety reasons. AI needs to be treated similarly.
The reality: we don't even get public LLM models, let alone source code, while their coffers overfloweth.
Awesome for OpenAI and their employees! Every else goes without. Public benefit my arse.