News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-... by dkjaudyeqooe on Friday March 01, 2024 @12:35PM (#39564262)
The point of their charter is not to make money, it's to develop AI for the benefit of all, which I interpret to mean putting control and exploitation of AI in the hands of the public.

The reality: we don't even get public LLM models, let alone source code, while their coffers overfloweth.

Awesome for OpenAI and their employees! Every else goes without. Public benefit my arse.

Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-... by mrinterweb on Friday March 01, 2024 @01:01PM (#39564620)
I've been really hung up on the irony of "Open" part of the OpenAI name. I figure "Open" must mean "open for business". What is open about OpenAI?
Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-... by dkjaudyeqooe on Friday March 01, 2024 @01:13PM (#39564780)
The most oppressive regimes have "Democratic" or "People's" in the official name of their country.

Someone took inspiration from this.

Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-... by wmf on Friday March 01, 2024 @01:41PM (#39565157)
They changed their minds and didn't change the name. That's all.
Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-... by mrinterweb on Friday March 01, 2024 @02:28PM (#39565774)
If that's the case the name should come with an asterisk and footnote. Keeping "Open" in the name is not genuine. Its would be like a superhero group called themselves "Hero Squad" and decided being superheros is not profitable as villainy, but still calling themselves Hero Squad despite the obvious operational changes.
Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-... by TheKarateKid on Friday March 01, 2024 @01:37PM (#39565121)
While I completely agree, I think we've seen enough to realize that something as powerful as what OpenAI is developing shouldn't be freely released to the public. Not as a product, nor as source code.

Dangerous and powerful things like weapons and chemicals are restricted in both physical and informational form for safety reasons. AI needs to be treated similarly.

Re:Musk sues Altman seeking a return to open source and non-... by advael on Saturday March 02, 2024 @02:09AM (#39570560)
So you believe that Microsoft can on average more be trusted with dangerous technology than humanity as a whole?

A bold claim given their track record