News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Docusign just admitted that they use customer data to tra... by jcoder on Thursday February 29, 2024 @11:46PM (#39558609)
Why a xitter post of a screenshot with no link when the full article is public? https://support.docusign.com/s/document-item?language=en_US&...
Re:Docusign just admitted that they use customer data to tra... by NewJazz on Friday March 01, 2024 @12:11AM (#39558737)
Because that article is published by docusign and they could change it.
Re:Docusign just admitted that they use customer data to tra... by DistractionRect on Friday March 01, 2024 @12:24AM (#39558815)
In that case a link to an archived copy is preferable to a screenshot of the partial document hosted by Twitter.
Re:Docusign just admitted that they use customer data to tra... by fddrdplktrew on Friday March 01, 2024 @03:35AM (#39559835)
An archive link should be added as a comment automatically for all posts... in some cases it would even allow you to bypass paywalls...
Re:Docusign just admitted that they use customer data to tra... by ehPReth on Friday March 01, 2024 @01:04AM (#39559014)
https://web.archive.org (take a screenshot option if you have a login and it's JS madness WBM can't handle), https://archive.ph, etc (hopefully captured more than one if possible) - random screenshots are proof of absolutely nothing.

(here's one for the page above: https://archive.is/e6K4K)

Re:Docusign just admitted that they use customer data to tra... by ankit219 on Friday March 01, 2024 @01:39AM (#39559190)
Because twitter downranks any tweet with link, so now users put a pic/screenshot in first tweet with the link in the next tweet.
Re:Docusign just admitted that they use customer data to tra... by silok on Friday March 01, 2024 @04:43AM (#39560211)
Also because xitter provides a broader discussion platform and reach compared to only HN (even though I highly appreciate the HN content). But yeah, the xitter post should preferably also contain that url to the source.