Re:Airfoil
by petsfed on Tuesday February 27, 2024 @02:29PM
(#39528546)
I have a friend whose PhD is in computational flow dynamics, as applied to airfoil design. He works almost exclusively in fortran (which is wild to me, for someone under 35, but I guess its the "industry" standard). I just asked him about xfoil and he observed that there are more modern programs for (as he put it) more "realistic/complex" designs, but said it was a good starting place.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
oh i'm sure state of the art has advanced since then. i have the necessary physics background, but it's not otherwise my domain: i once used xfoil to design an airfoil for an autonomous model glider as a hackerspace project back when i had free time for things like that many years ago. the glider was also loaded into x-plane to develop and test the autonomous part. so whenever various experimental aircraft projects popup, i'm likely to look into them, and then also notice the peculiar foils they use.
Because Fortran was the industry standard for any heavy scientific calculation (like aerodynamics or nuclear bombs), the Fortran compiler has been optimised to death... And thus Fortran is still the industry standard.
Re:Airfoil
by KWxIUElW8Xt0tD9 on Wednesday February 28, 2024 @09:48AM
(#39538629)
FORTRAN is easier to optimize than something like C so is much used for numerical computation