The half of HN without proper impeccable impulse control are probably on a list now. You could have said "hate that I learnt lingo used by abusers, just by being on Freenet".

For those wondering, the initialism relates to extreme child abuse. And now I too get to wish I hadn't looked.

FWIW, I am relatively certain a good chunk of HN users are marked as "mostly harmless" already. In other words, we are all on the list. We just have different tags:D

edit: Or at least, if I was responsible for running IC, we would all be on the list with appropriate tags. Thankfully, I am not.

I find that surprising, even in 2010 it was difficult to find illegal content on Freenet unless you were looking for it - and certainly in recent years it's virtually impossible, the default indexes are carefully vetted.

In any case, the original Freenet was never going to be a general-purpose replacement for today's centralized services as it can only handle static content. For the past few years we've been working on a sequel to Freenet that is much more general-purpose, you can learn about it at https://freenet.org/. While the original Freenet was analagous to a decentralized hard drive, the new Freenet is like a decentralized computer.

As part of it we're building a decentralized reputation system (based on a "web of trust") to address illegal/offensive/objectionable content.

I'm guessing it isn't Parent-Teacher Home Conference.

Not to embarrass you doing a nearly effortless Google search for the answer, but it's clearly Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography /s [1]

On a more serious note - part of me really wants to know, and a much larger part of me doesn't.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percutaneous_transhepatic_chol...

For better or worse, the answer to your question is in the header of the Wikipedia page you linked.

Amusingly, I nearly had that procedure done.