Re:AI 'dream girls' are coming for porn stars' jobs
by jkic47 on Sunday February 25, 2024 @01:43PM
(#39503494)
Simple. While not all activities depicted in porn are damaging to all people, some activities can be damaging some people. Doesn't have to be black or white. Make sense?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AI 'dream girls' are coming for porn stars' jobs
by hpenvy on Sunday February 25, 2024 @03:05PM
(#39504244)
Do you think that the distortions effects are negative or positive overall now? And in the future? I'd argue they are positive now and in the future, so it sounds like this is where your disagreement is coming from (since you said it as if it's overwhelmingly negative now and into the future).
Re:AI 'dream girls' are coming for porn stars' jobs
by x86x87 on Sunday February 25, 2024 @02:30PM
(#39503948)
Can you find one example of an activity (outside porn) that is beneficial to all people?
Re:AI 'dream girls' are coming for porn stars' jobs
by jkic47 on Monday February 26, 2024 @06:04PM
(#39517913)
Smiling, for one? :-)
Re:AI 'dream girls' are coming for porn stars' jobs
by x86x87 on Monday February 26, 2024 @09:00PM
(#39519191)
nope. i can find cases where smiling is not beneficial. Eg: Lookup Angelman syndrome and tell me again how smiling is beneficial to parents that have a kid with this disease.
What else do you have?