Re:Scientists extract images directly from brain
by robg on Thursday December 11, 2008 @05:43PM
(#394976)
For instance, here's a seminal paper predicting which category (faces, place, object) was going to be recalled from studied pictures and a second or two before it was actually recalled:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/310/5756/1963.pdf?maxt...
Still, that's a big difference from predicting (or mindreading) the particular item.
And here's a good review of that and similar work:
Re:Scientists extract images directly from brain
by aswanson on Thursday December 11, 2008 @07:31PM
(#395121)
Do you have any publications of your research online?
Re:Scientists extract images directly from brain
by robg on Thursday December 11, 2008 @07:49PM
(#395138)
Been meaning to put a home page together.
Here are two empirical reports: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/26/18/4917 http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/27/14/3790
And here's a review: http://www.psych.upenn.edu/stslab/assets/pdf/TS_CONB05.pdf
Happy to answer questions at grob AT mass inst tech
In other words, ignore the PR about downloading thoughts and dreams. We can decode some stuff from fMRI activity patterns but we're soon swamped by noise, even when using machine learning techniques. The data just isn't there. It's like trying to predict the weather two weeks from now. The system is inherently noisy.