News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Intel Processor Instability Causing Oodle Decompression Failures. Parent comment

Re:Intel Processor Instability Causing Oodle Decompression F... by bonzini on Friday February 23, 2024 @05:51AM (#39479112)
Those electrical code cross sections are for 350A at 230V, corresponding to about 80 kW (400V is the same as it's actually three 230V wires).

Processors operate at about 1V. At 300W it's enough to use a much smaller cross section, which is split across many traces.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Intel Processor Instability Causing Oodle Decompression F... by coryrc on Friday February 23, 2024 @05:55AM (#39479140)
That's not how I^2R losses work. Voltage is not relevant.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Intel Processor Instability Causing Oodle Decompression F... by planede on Friday February 23, 2024 @10:25AM (#39481691)
I agree. However voltage is relevant for insulation, which also affects how heat can dissipate for the wire, and might also be relevant for a failing wire, when higher and higher voltage can build up at the point of failure (not sure if it's a common engineering consideration outside of fuses, which are designed to fail).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Intel Processor Instability Causing Oodle Decompression F... by bonzini on Saturday February 24, 2024 @09:11AM (#39491603)
At 300W there's only so much power that can become heat. With 80 kW flowing through the wire, if the insulation melts due to excessive wire resistance you call the fire brigade.
[ Parent | on HN ]