She is an egocentric person who could not handle the fact that he wanted to help both her company and TC, the brand that he spent many years of his life building. So she kicked him off the board in a completely immature way.

Not getting involved in blog politics, but Arrington/Crunchfund is an investor in Pando, TC is a competitor, the Pando Execs and board likely made a decision based on the competitive environment.

I can see for a generic company with investors A, B, and C; if B decided to get involved with a competitor, the board and execs might make plans accordingly. We've seen this in the seed VC world with express decisions to not invest in competing companies.

Basically Sarah Lacy was upset that Arrington et al would still participate in TechCrunch-related events.

Here is Arrington's side: http://uncrunched.com/2012/04/09/about-pando/

Here is a short blurb by MG Siegler: http://parislemon.com/post/20832114453/pando

Thanks, that clears things up.

Who gives a flying f---?