Re:Reading a Programmer's Guide to Common Lisp
by kragen on Thursday February 22, 2024 @01:25PM
(#39471035)
also basic variables are global. most of these languages let you create global variables anywhere, or at least anywhere outside of a subroutine
Re:Reading a Programmer's Guide to Common Lisp
by gknoy on Thursday February 22, 2024 @01:26PM
(#39471046)
I hope this doesn't derail the conversation much, but I found it interesting that you seem to be using 5 digit years, a convention I've never seen before. What drives this choice?
Re:Reading a Programmer's Guide to Common Lisp
by kragen on Thursday February 22, 2024 @01:57PM
(#39471431)
it turns out it's sort of like wearing a mohawk. a long now mohawk. it's a completely harmless deviation from convention which provokes an amazing variety of reactions, some astonishingly aggressive, while other people react thoughtfully
Re:Reading a Programmer's Guide to Common Lisp
by michael1999 on Thursday February 22, 2024 @04:17PM
(#39473388)
Thank you. I hadn't drawn the parallel before. But that matches my experience with both.
the exception is basic, where you could defint i or dim x(128) at any point, but it would be an understatement to say that basic's conventions were not widely emulated by other languages