Future of 32-bit platform support in FreeBSD

Re:Future of 32-bit platform support in FreeBSD by dooglius on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @07:33AM (#39440461)

I thought the Linux kernel enforces/requires a pointer to fit into a long, so any platform with Linux will define long type as appropriately sized?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Future of 32-bit platform support in FreeBSD by DinoCoder99 on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @10:49AM (#39442717)

I'd much prefer C users not use long at all. What's wrong with size_t and uint32_t and uint64_t?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Future of 32-bit platform support in FreeBSD by UncleEntity on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @12:14PM (#39443876)

> What's wrong with size_t and uint32_t and uint64_t?

An extra #include and more typing?

Plus, all the C89 users are out of luck...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Future of 32-bit platform support in FreeBSD by int_19h on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @01:43PM (#39445098)

It's trivial to roll your own basic <stdint.h> with those types for existing C89 implementations.

Unless they don't provide the corresponding type natively at all (which can be the case for some 16-bit platforms and 64-bit). But then you have a bigger problem anyway.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Future of 32-bit platform support in FreeBSD by legulere on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @02:45PM (#39445963)

Only with effort Linux was able to be ported to Clang. All compilers that compile Linux should also be able to deal with size_t and consorts.

[ Parent | on HN ]