News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by notnmeyer on Monday February 19, 2024 @09:40PM (#39437441)
> I know several world class programmers, and interestingly, the commonality among them is that they all seem to use Vim as their code editor. Many people I know who think of themselves as world class programmers use Emacs.

haha, shots fired!

Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by logicprog on Monday February 19, 2024 @10:39PM (#39437799)
Considering how confidently utterly wrong the author of this article seems to be about Vim and to an even more substantial degree Emacs, I'm not inclined to put much stock in this as an insight.
Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by porphyra on Monday February 19, 2024 @10:51PM (#39437871)
I think it was just a bad joke rather than an insight. As a neovim user myself, I personally know a couple of extremely oustanding programmers who use emacs.
Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by notnmeyer on Sunday February 25, 2024 @04:40PM (#39505082)
yeah, i read it as a joke as well.
Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by rtpg on Monday February 19, 2024 @10:25PM (#39437722)
Evil mode giving you Vim macros, combined with Elisp as a real programming language.... ooh now that's some fun IDE a la carte-ing
Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by umvi on Monday February 19, 2024 @10:29PM (#39437745)
And then you have Linus Torvalds who uses nano
Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by I_like_pigeons on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @04:53AM (#39439486)
I thought he used his own fork of a micro emacs?
Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by umvi on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @12:05PM (#39443758)
Ah, yes, my mistake, he was only thinking of switching to nano:

> And it's all done in a traditional terminal, although I don't use 'vi'. I use this abomination called "micro-emacs", which has absolutely nothing to do with GNU emacs except that some of the key bindings are similar. I got used to it at the University of Helsinki when I was a wee lad, and I've not been able to wean myself from it, although I suspect I will have to soon enough. I hacked up (a very limited) utf-8 support for it a few years ago, but it's really showing its age, and showing all the signs of having been written in the 80's and the version I use was a fork that hasn't been maintained since the mid 90's.

> University of Helsinki used it because it worked on DOS, VAX/VMS and Unix, which is why I got introduced to it. And now my fingers are hardcoded for it. I really need to switch over to something that is actually maintained and does utf-8 properly. Probably 'nano'. But my hacked-up piece of historical garbage works just barely well enough that I've never been really forced to teach my old fingers new tricks.

https://www.tag1consulting.com/blog/interview-linus-torvalds...

Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by doctor_eval on Monday February 19, 2024 @10:21PM (#39437689)
Right? The greats all used ed.
Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by gkhartman on Monday February 19, 2024 @10:31PM (#39437758)
Nah, programmers of that caliber will use a magnetized needle directly on the hard disk platters.
Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by antiframe on Monday February 19, 2024 @11:22PM (#39438035)
I see where you're going with this, so let's just shortcut ourselves to the end: the Emacs command `M-x butterfly`.
Re:Pulsar, the best code editor since Atom by overtomanu on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @01:00AM (#39438458)
for those who don't know -> https://xkcd.com/378/