News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A steep rise of Hacker News in Google rankings by matheusmoreira on Monday February 19, 2024 @08:57PM (#39437170)
It's not really "nepotic". The goal was to reduce the number of accounts you need to look at to some manageable number. Ideally you discover some root spammer account and ban the entire tree under the assumption they're all spam accounts. Then you ban the guy who was dumb enough to invite a spammer into the community since they clearly cannot be trusted. If you can't or won't ban them, you take away their invitation privileges.

If the problematic account is too high up in the tree, then they probably have way too many descendants which increases the false positive rate which means you can't conclude that they're bad based on the fact they're invitees of a bad account. Essentially, the spammers diluted themselves inside a huge number of maybe good users so that you can't blanket ban them without collateral damage. In that case you're better off banning the bad account individually and looking for new bad roots further down the tree.

Re:A steep rise of Hacker News in Google rankings by withinboredom on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @01:57AM (#39438681)
A rationalization of nepotism doesn't make it not nepotism.

Let's look at the definition:

> the practice among those with power or influence of favouring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs

Basically, if you are friends with the "right people" (aka, people closer to the root), no matter what they do, you are fine. You aren't getting banned for one of their actions. That is people in power (closer to the root) favoring friends (the people they invited), where "power" is the ability to behave with near impunity without severe repercussions.