Re:Talent is everywhere, opportunity is not. We are all losi...
by riehwvfbk on Monday February 19, 2024 @05:50PM
(#39435782)
I don't think it's a weird comparison at all: households include dual-income-no-kids households too, and they would skew the average higher. To raise a family in the Bay Area one parent has to stay home, or a lot of money has to be paid for childcare (to the tune of 20-30k per year per kid).
I don't think this is quite the "gotcha, you are actually rich!" that you wanted this to be.
And hey, I googled the numbers too before posting ;)
You are inadvertently correct, but in the opposite way than you probably think.
$200K is more than 3x the median individual income in the US.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEPAINUSA646N
It's slightly under 3x the median household income, but it seems strange to compare a median household income to an individual's salary.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA646N
If we confine our comparison to only California, I couldn't find median individual income, but median household income is only 14% higher than the nationwide median, so it seems likely that individual income in CA tracks similarly: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSCAA646N