News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hip to be square – 70 years of the Citroën H Van by TacticalCoder on Monday February 19, 2024 @03:08PM (#39434152)
Re:Hip to be square – 70 years of the Citroën H Van by rozap on Monday February 19, 2024 @06:49PM (#39436282)
Meh. Porsche is the worst "interesting design" offender imo, with just marginal iterative improvements over time with nothing truly ambitious. Porsche has never had to really rethink their designs because they do evolution, not revolution. One can argue that that's how you design something great (the GT3 RS is quite a car...) but I still find it kind of boring. And in the world of toy cars, boring is the worst adjective. The porschephiles may downvote all they like :)

The hydropneumatic suspension was a bold move, and is still an engineering marvel. The CX has a better ride than a lot of current cars. Meanwhile the 2024 mustang Mach E was so inept at controlling its weight that my wife got nauseous riding in it. Maybe we don't pay attention to ideas that came before us at the wrong time.

I think really wild engineering decisions are underrated. As an enthusiast, it's a shame that the car industry seems to have gotten more averse to crazy design decisions over time.

Re:Hip to be square – 70 years of the Citroën H Van by kergonath on Monday February 19, 2024 @07:10PM (#39436437)
All these are much more conventional, though. They scream luxury or expensive sport car, but none of them has the character of the SM or its space age aesthetics. I don’t really like it, but I have to admit that it has something special.