ShowHN: Htmz – a low power tool for HTML

Re:ShowHN: Htmz – a low power tool for HTML by bachmeier on Monday February 19, 2024 @12:00PM (#39432018)

> I would fear if anyone wants to use this in production

Why? How would it be different from using htmx?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ShowHN: Htmz – a low power tool for HTML by Kalabasa on Monday February 19, 2024 @04:52PM (#39435276)

It's just a weird feeling for someone to use a hack / experiment as a foundation or something. I know 'the software is provided "as is ", without warranty'.

The difference with htmx is that they are more polished.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ShowHN: Htmz – a low power tool for HTML by Exoristos on Monday February 19, 2024 @07:11PM (#39436442)

I would caution against using HTMX in production, either, from personal experience.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ShowHN: Htmz – a low power tool for HTML by recursivedoubts on Monday February 19, 2024 @07:25PM (#39436559)

I've been looking for someone to write a negative htmx experience analysis to host on the essays page:

https://htmx.org/essays

i don't want people to pick htmx if it's going to be a bad choice for their particular application, would be happy to work w/ you to get something put together

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ShowHN: Htmz – a low power tool for HTML by yawaramin on Tuesday February 20, 2024 @01:53AM (#39438669)

For one thing, it seems like it wouldn't gracefully degrade in functionality if JavaScript was disabled or unavailable. With htmx you can use its HX-Request header to check whether a request is from htmx or not, and serve a partial HTML or a full page accordingly. So no matter the circumstances, you can maintain a good user experience.

[ Parent | on HN ]