News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ask HN: Nitter officially declared "over" today, alternatives?. Parent comment

Re:Ask HN: Nitter officially declared "over" today, alternat... by anileated on Thursday February 15, 2024 @10:18PM (#39392777)
> how does having an account to view twitter meaningfully change anything during this mystick time of AI?

> If it's to prevent AIs from reading twitter threads, well, good luck.

If you require an account, it’s harder to scrape you and train an AI for free using platform you've build with your own investment and effort. Until court rule in favor of copyright holders, welcome to the future where nothing is shared in the open anymore.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Nitter officially declared "over" today, alternat... by soraminazuki on Friday February 16, 2024 @12:36AM (#39393565)
I'm curious who you consider that rights holder to be.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Nitter officially declared "over" today, alternat... by anileated on Friday February 16, 2024 @11:25AM (#39399122)
The creator.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Nitter officially declared "over" today, alternat... by soraminazuki on Saturday February 17, 2024 @10:03PM (#39415764)
I asked because it sounded as if you considered it to be the platform. And let's not kid ourselves by pretending that this has to do with protecting the creators.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Nitter officially declared "over" today, alternat... by anileated on Sunday February 18, 2024 @10:19PM (#39425943)
No, it’s simply that if it’s a violation against the creator, then the platform by extension doesn’t get hammered.

By the way, you know for legal purposes those creators (copyright holders) also include guys like Disney, Warner Bros, Penguin et al. right?

[ Parent | on HN ]