Our next-generation model: Gemini 1.5

Re:Our next-generation model: Gemini 1.5 by foliveira on Thursday February 15, 2024 @10:38AM (#39383982)

>"Gemini 1.5 Pro (...) matches or surpasses Gemini 1.0 Ultra’s state-of-the-art performance across a broad set of benchmarks."

So Pro is better than Ultra, but only if the version numbers are higher?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our next-generation model: Gemini 1.5 by denysvitali on Thursday February 15, 2024 @11:22AM (#39384591)

Yes, but you'd have to wait for Gemini Pro Max next year to see the real improvements

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our next-generation model: Gemini 1.5 by renewiltord on Thursday February 15, 2024 @11:51AM (#39385017)

Isn't that usually the case with many products? Like the M3 Pro CPU in the new Macs is more powerful than the M1 Max in the old Macs.

The Nano < Pro < Ultra is an in-revision thing. For their LLMs it's a size thing. Then there's newer releases of Nano, Pro, and Ultra. Some Pro might be better than some older Ultra.

A lot of people seem confused about this but it feels so easy to understand that it's confusing to me that anyone could have trouble.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our next-generation model: Gemini 1.5 by devindotcom on Thursday February 15, 2024 @12:51PM (#39385839)

Apple didn't release the M3 Pro a week after the M1 Max

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our next-generation model: Gemini 1.5 by renewiltord on Thursday February 15, 2024 @12:59PM (#39385942)

Adam Osborne’s wife was one of my dad’s patients so I’m not unacquainted with the risk of early announcements. But surely they do not prevent comprehension.

[ Parent | on HN ]