Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e...
by px43 on Saturday February 17, 2024 @12:43AM
(#39406768)
Do you think F-Droid is more resilient to malicious influence than Google's Play Store?
I haven't looked deeply into how F-Droid is currently operating, so maybe I'm off here, but isn't it just all on a server run by some random guy in his free time? I love what F-Droid is doing, and I think it has a bright future, but in its current state I would never trust it on any of my devices that I use for anything important.
Also, yeah, it really is super easy to crack open the WhatApp APK and confirm that it is, in fact, using libsignal. That would be kind of a weird thing to lie about, since anyone could quickly call them out on it.
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e...
by guappa on Monday February 19, 2024 @04:18AM
(#39427628)
Using libsignal doesn't mean that there is no API to enable a side channel :)
I think that google and apple would just comply and do whatever they are told, while the f-droid guy needs to be hacked and might notice he got hacked, so in that sense it's safer.
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e...
by shortsunblack on Saturday February 17, 2024 @11:26AM
(#39410859)
Them not being on F-Droid is justifiable because F-Droid app IS less secure than alternatives. It does not use modern Android session installer, which is problematic in many different ways. Granted, there are third party F-Droid apps like Droidify that fix these issues.
I'm sure the protocol is fine and all, but playstore can easily be used to compromise everything anyway.
Also I've read many times Bruce Schneier claim that Signal is the most secure communication system that exists, and Whatsapp is the 2nd best, because it (allegedly, but we don't know) uses the same protocol.