News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Terence Tao, "Machine Assisted Proof" [video] by rvz on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @10:28PM (#39378766)
I wouldn't be so reliant on AI black-boxes like ChatGPT to learn anything from medicine, law or even mathematics and you don't even trust if its outputs are even correct.

Terrance Tao doesn't even trust its outputs either and can verify if it is outputting nonsense that may look 'correct' in your eyes.

Re:Terence Tao, "Machine Assisted Proof" [video] by pfdietz on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @11:23PM (#39379083)
Ah, but the nice thing about constructing formal proofs is you can immediately tell if the output is correct.
Re:Terence Tao, "Machine Assisted Proof" [video] by practal on Thursday February 15, 2024 @10:59AM (#39384288)
Yes, but you also need to make sure the input is correct! For example, your idea of automatically formalising a paper needs to somehow make sure that the result means the same as the paper.
Re:Terence Tao, "Machine Assisted Proof" [video] by Sakos on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @10:41PM (#39378842)
I don't blindly believe everything it says. I've caught it making mistakes plenty of times. But there's simply no going back anymore. There's no replacing what it can do and the kind of workflow it offers.