Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ...
by DiscourseFan on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @06:53PM
(#39377245)
I'm getting very strong "angels on a pinhead" vibes from this
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ...
by jacquesm on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @07:45PM
(#39377690)
With the minute difference that we do not have experimental validation for Angels dancing on a pinhead whereas there is a massive amount of experimental validation for the standard model.
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ...
by DonHopkins on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @08:59PM
(#39378233)
I thought he meant "angles on a pinhead".
Now you're talkin' tri-angular!
https://cidu.info/2022/05/06/thats-a-cute-angle/
Right angles are wrong angles! Death to th' T-square!
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ...
by DiscourseFan on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @10:46PM
(#39378872)
Thank you for your contribution, my fellow Pynchon Enjoyer
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ...
by DiscourseFan on Thursday February 15, 2024 @04:41AM
(#39380763)
So you're saying that all we need to do is experimentally validate the number of angels dancing on a pinhead?
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ...
by wombatpm on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @11:00PM
(#39378962)
Measure the area of a pinhead, divide by cross-sectional area of an angel. Easy peasy.
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ...
by jacquesm on Thursday February 15, 2024 @05:12AM
(#39380962)
Division by zero error.
Re:Inside the proton, the ‘most complicated thing you could ...
by DiscourseFan on Friday February 16, 2024 @04:14AM
(#39394853)
Its still purely theoretical, but a lot of work has already been done to show experimental evidence of angels. I think we're pretty close to confirming their existence.