Re:Judge rejects most ChatGPT copyright claims from book aut...
by Ferret7446 on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @01:14AM
(#39367033)
Does that mean you could rewrite, say, Harry Potter from scratch without violating copyright?
Re:Judge rejects most ChatGPT copyright claims from book aut...
by lostmsu on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @01:22AM
(#39367071)
Yes, but unless you change names it would be a trademark violation.
Re:Judge rejects most ChatGPT copyright claims from book aut...
by alexey-salmin on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @03:14AM
(#39367666)
Normally that's the case even though at least one of those books was taken down based on (rather dubious imo) violation of rights on derivative works. It was never a verbatim rewrite nor a trademark violation. The Dutch court even proceeded to make a list of similar ideas between two books which I think is explicitly disallowed under the US version of the copyright law.
Re:Judge rejects most ChatGPT copyright claims from book aut...
by thinkertraveler on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @08:17AM
(#39369438)
( Not only that, even what they say it's russian culture and folklore, it's based on polish history and tales:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Łysa_Góra )
Patents protect the implementation of an idea, so you’d be fine.
There is no IP protection for the abstract idea of doing something, and that is as it should be.