News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Waymo car vandalized and lit on fire in San Francisco by ImPostingOnHN on Tuesday February 13, 2024 @10:18AM (#39358378)
> > Remember, the use case is a village whose taxi needs are satisfied by 1 car per village

> Eh? No, absurd. I'm not sure where you got that

Scroll to the top of the thread you've been discussing:

> The square mile around me has fewer than 4 journeys an hour to anywhere[0]

> a taxi service would be brilliant, my son could get to scouts and back under his own steam. Automated or manual doesn’t matter, but we can’t sustain a taxi service. - there’s one in a town about 6 miles away. One taxi.[1]

So, not only not "absurd", but explicitly specified.

----

> I already said, I was never talking about rail systems in obscure regions

This thread concerns villages, not suburbs of cities. Specifically villages with 0-1 taxis serving them, and a total trip demand of fewer than 4 people per hour.

This thread is about running self-driving cars vs. train lines for that city and cities like that.

You joined this thread.

I think we can be forgiven for thinking you were talking about the topic of the thread you joined, and not something else :) Everybody makes mistakes, right?

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39333564

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39333882

Re:Waymo car vandalized and lit on fire in San Francisco by smaudet on Tuesday February 13, 2024 @12:33PM (#39360227)
Sure, and my mistake, if any, was assuming the topic had changed (as happens in the course of comment threads).

Regarding the individual with a taxi in a town 6 miles away, I didn't mean to imply he would definitely be serviced. Instead, its more likely he would be able to walk/find some transportation to a local rail line, if we had a rail line network.

This would still be better than the current state of affairs, by the sound of it - maybe be able to hire a taxi vs being able to walk with their son to a nearby station.

If this individual is truly in a remote region, nothing will solve that. Last mile can and should still be solved by alternative low-cost low-frequency transportation such as cars, bicycles, low-cost trams, buses, airplanes, drones, etc.

Re:Waymo car vandalized and lit on fire in San Francisco by ImPostingOnHN on Tuesday February 13, 2024 @12:48PM (#39360455)
> If this individual is truly in a remote region, nothing will solve that.

That seems a little fatalistic! I would hope the comment would be "I can't think of anything that would solve that".

Because I and a few others can: Self-driving vehicles. Cars or busses. That's what we were discussing before someone mentioned that no, self-driving cars are bad for this specific use case, trains would be better.

Re:Waymo car vandalized and lit on fire in San Francisco by smaudet on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @12:21AM (#39366785)
> That's what we were discussing before someone mentioned that no, self-driving cars are bad for this specific use case, trains would be better.

That's a gross mischaracterization of what I actually said, which was that we have an unfortunate network of roads and barely any rail.

And, furthermore, if you have the infrastructure to support refueling stations, then you aren't so remote, are you? If you have such infrastructure, then you probably have a population density to support other infrastructure, like rail. And yes, that is always preferable (as your main means of long distance land based travel).